This week sees the annual Vistage UK Speaker Reception and it reminds me of the wonderful resource that we have in Vistage.
Looking back over many speaker sessions, I now realise how many of them have had a direct influence on the way that I look at business and, even in some cases, how I look at life.
One of my members recently discussed how he would like to restructure his business and that brought back a remark from a speaker that "the only rationale for restructuring the business is to give better service to the customer"".
That is a very powerful statement and brings into play many consequential thoughts. A great deal of restructuring is done for internal reasons - we lose a key member of staff, the market changes in some way, suppliers change and so on. Very infrequently do we assess how we deliver good service and then restructure to give even better service.
I recall a member of one of my groups who was a manufacturer of flavours and essences for the food industry. He was experiencing Chinese Wall problems with his organisation which was, as is so common, structured on functional lines - vertical functions such as sales, exports, finance, technical, operations and so on.
Each of the functions seemed to be in conflict with another rather than acting as collaborators to satisfy the market needs. Protectionism was the order of the day. That meant that departments made sure that they were never at fault and a blame culture ensued with functions competing against each other instead of with each other.
He decided on a really radical approach to solve the problem. Because the company supplied effectively four markets - savouries, desserts, soft drinks and exports, he decided to restructure on market rather than functional lines.
As a consequence, each team, dedicated to their own market sector, had sales, technical and operations people with finance and IT acting in a floating role with all the teams.
This matrix organisation had several benefits. Firstly it served the needs of the customer in that there was a dedicated team for each market sector, who became more expert in the particular requirements of that sector, secondly, the teams started to work together because the blame culture dissipated and thirdly, the teams retained their competitiveness but in a smart way to the advantage of themselves and the business.
All in all it was a resounding success with dramatic improvements in performance and morale.
Its success is, of course, dependent on the business having a range of markets in which it operates although it is also feasible to analyse the current customer base to see if there is any way in which that can be divided into realistic semi-sectors.
Perhaps the big learning comes from the general need to get away from the standard functional organisation structure which by definition almost, contributes to introspection and protectionism. In the end, it must be to the advantage of the customer and hence the business to root that out.
For more information visit www.vistage.co.uk and www.vistageblog.co.uk
To contact us, email to email@example.com
Possibly the most complicated part of doing business is dealing with people simply because each one is unique and generally speaking, we d...
There seems to have been a proliferation of rather high flown new titles in business for people who are doing jobs which have been done fo...
Attending the Vistage Speakers Reception at Ashdown Park this week, reminded me of the many tips and ideas which we take away from our speak...